<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Rory's Blog - facebook</title>
    <link>http://rory.streetfamily.info/</link>
    <description>Do you want Black Pepper with that?</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Rory Street</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:48:17 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 1.9.6264.0</generator>
    <managingEditor>blog@streetfamily.info</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>blog@streetfamily.info</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://rory.streetfamily.info/Trackback.aspx?guid=d409426e-75e6-4a35-b230-18b95e2a25e4</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://rory.streetfamily.info/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://rory.streetfamily.info/PermaLink,guid,d409426e-75e6-4a35-b230-18b95e2a25e4.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Rory Street</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://rory.streetfamily.info/CommentView,guid,d409426e-75e6-4a35-b230-18b95e2a25e4.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://rory.streetfamily.info/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=d409426e-75e6-4a35-b230-18b95e2a25e4</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
Google Buzz yet another release by the search engine giant in an attempt to get a
piece of the large social network and micro blogging platform pie Facebook and Twitter
have carved up among themselves. What surprises me about Google Buzz is that Microsoft
and Yahoo have implemented such functionality in their own offerings Hotmail and Yahoo
Mail some time ago. Although as always Microsoft's marketing department seems far
better with its software and OS offerings than anything to do with its email and social
networking platforms. Yahoo on the other hand appears more interested in getting people
to change their home page to Yahoo (we have all seen the TV ads) but they haven't
really given us a reason why (or I have missed the reason). I have tried out Yahoo's
offerings and can't quite understand why its better. They have added some nifty little
gadgets such as the search pad and they have integrated their own form of "Buzz" (and
they will probably cringe when I use that word), in the way of allowing people to
see your updated status and enabling you to hook in YouTube, Twitter, Picasa, StumbleUpon
(to mention a few) into your status updates. 
</p>
        <p>
I suppose Microsoft and Yahoo's approach to the whole subject has been well if we
can't beat them we may as well come up with a way to compliment or to work with the
flow. In this way Microsoft and Yahoo knew people wanted to keep using these networks
and nothing they could offer would sway them from using them, so decided to make all
these things easily accessible from their own platforms. "Hey guys you can access
all your social networking from one site!"
</p>
        <p>
I think Google have thought of much the same theme however Google has been a lot more
vocal about it or maybe its just that we pay a lot more attention when Google says
something than if Microsoft or Yahoo says something these days? Google unlike the
others has given it a name, Microsoft now a days when they give something a name seem
to confuse customers even more. First it was MSN, then Live, then live search became
Bing and then there was something called Windows Live services and what happened to
hotmail oh is that Windows Live Mail now? Google are very good at keeping what they
offer clear and to the point. Googles' web pages are clean and you're not too confused
on where to go. Yahoo and Microsoft's Live/hotmail/MSN (what ever they call it now).
Is very much hidden away or not that easy to find on their busy and very advertising
focused websites. I remember thinking a while back I would like to try out Microsoft's
new search they kept on talking about it but I couldn't figure out what site to go
to to find it. I eventually found it under <a href="http://www.live.com">www.live.com</a>,
however Microsoft rebranded it yet again and now are asking people who visit their
home page to change it to <a href="http://www.bing.com">www.bing.com</a>. Maybe Microsoft
would be more successful with their offerings which are pretty good if they were more
consistent and didn't keep on changing their minds on what they were going to call
themselves. Few people realise that they can access Microsoft's online version of
Office (albeit in Beta) from their accounts as you can with Google Docs.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://rory.streetfamily.info/aggbug.ashx?id=d409426e-75e6-4a35-b230-18b95e2a25e4" />
      </body>
      <title>Google Buzz, Yahoo Buzz, Windows Buzz&amp;hellip;.</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rory.streetfamily.info/PermaLink,guid,d409426e-75e6-4a35-b230-18b95e2a25e4.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://rory.streetfamily.info/PermaLink,guid,d409426e-75e6-4a35-b230-18b95e2a25e4.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:48:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
Google Buzz yet another release by the search engine giant in an attempt to get a
piece of the large social network and micro blogging platform pie Facebook and Twitter
have carved up among themselves. What surprises me about Google Buzz is that Microsoft
and Yahoo have implemented such functionality in their own offerings Hotmail and Yahoo
Mail some time ago. Although as always Microsoft's marketing department seems far
better with its software and OS offerings than anything to do with its email and social
networking platforms. Yahoo on the other hand appears more interested in getting people
to change their home page to Yahoo (we have all seen the TV ads) but they haven't
really given us a reason why (or I have missed the reason). I have tried out Yahoo's
offerings and can't quite understand why its better. They have added some nifty little
gadgets such as the search pad and they have integrated their own form of "Buzz" (and
they will probably cringe when I use that word), in the way of allowing people to
see your updated status and enabling you to hook in YouTube, Twitter, Picasa, StumbleUpon
(to mention a few) into your status updates. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I suppose Microsoft and Yahoo's approach to the whole subject has been well if we
can't beat them we may as well come up with a way to compliment or to work with the
flow. In this way Microsoft and Yahoo knew people wanted to keep using these networks
and nothing they could offer would sway them from using them, so decided to make all
these things easily accessible from their own platforms. "Hey guys you can access
all your social networking from one site!"
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I think Google have thought of much the same theme however Google has been a lot more
vocal about it or maybe its just that we pay a lot more attention when Google says
something than if Microsoft or Yahoo says something these days? Google unlike the
others has given it a name, Microsoft now a days when they give something a name seem
to confuse customers even more. First it was MSN, then Live, then live search became
Bing and then there was something called Windows Live services and what happened to
hotmail oh is that Windows Live Mail now? Google are very good at keeping what they
offer clear and to the point. Googles' web pages are clean and you're not too confused
on where to go. Yahoo and Microsoft's Live/hotmail/MSN (what ever they call it now).
Is very much hidden away or not that easy to find on their busy and very advertising
focused websites. I remember thinking a while back I would like to try out Microsoft's
new search they kept on talking about it but I couldn't figure out what site to go
to to find it. I eventually found it under &lt;a href="http://www.live.com"&gt;www.live.com&lt;/a&gt;,
however Microsoft rebranded it yet again and now are asking people who visit their
home page to change it to &lt;a href="http://www.bing.com"&gt;www.bing.com&lt;/a&gt;. Maybe Microsoft
would be more successful with their offerings which are pretty good if they were more
consistent and didn't keep on changing their minds on what they were going to call
themselves. Few people realise that they can access Microsoft's online version of
Office (albeit in Beta) from their accounts as you can with Google Docs.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://rory.streetfamily.info/aggbug.ashx?id=d409426e-75e6-4a35-b230-18b95e2a25e4" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://rory.streetfamily.info/CommentView,guid,d409426e-75e6-4a35-b230-18b95e2a25e4.aspx</comments>
      <category>facebook;google;Yahoo</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://rory.streetfamily.info/Trackback.aspx?guid=bad79769-1588-4c85-b584-6682b3440f52</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://rory.streetfamily.info/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://rory.streetfamily.info/PermaLink,guid,bad79769-1588-4c85-b584-6682b3440f52.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Rory Street</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://rory.streetfamily.info/CommentView,guid,bad79769-1588-4c85-b584-6682b3440f52.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://rory.streetfamily.info/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=bad79769-1588-4c85-b584-6682b3440f52</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
          <a href="http://rory.streetfamily.info/content/binary/WindowsLiveWriter/SocialnetworksthenewEmail2.0_B446/FaceBook_2.jpg">
            <img title="FaceBook" style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; display: inline; margin: 0px 10px 0px 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="168" alt="FaceBook" src="http://rory.streetfamily.info/content/binary/WindowsLiveWriter/SocialnetworksthenewEmail2.0_B446/FaceBook_thumb.jpg" width="396" align="left" border="0" />
          </a> My
friend <a href="http://www.u-g-h.com/" target="_blank">Owen</a> Twittered this <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7942304.stm" target="_blank">interesting
article</a> on the BBC web site about how social networks are the "new e-mail". This
is a subject I have found pretty interesting, partly because every day of my life
since the Internet started to get popular I have been spammed excessively.
</p>
        <p>
I have 3 personal email accounts which I am not very good at checking. The only email
account that gets my full attention is my work email account. My work emails get sorted
into what needs my immediate attention and items that are mildly interesting that
I will file away and most probably forget about. There may be a few social contacts
which I will probably set myself a reminder to deal with later in Outlook. To me email
has become a real chore for every email account you have you need to sort the noise
from your real contacts. It has become such an issue that sometimes I give up all
together on my personal email account and sit down maybe once a week separating adverts,
circulars and spam from genuine friends emailing me. In the old days email was not
like this, when you received an email it was an exciting occasion, someone genuinely
wanted to contact you. Email used to feel the same as <a href="http://www.pc2paper.co.uk" target="_blank">receiving
a hand written letter in the post</a> from a friend, but now I find 1 out of 10 emails
is usually spam. 
</p>
        <p>
Social networks help you separate spam from friend pretty easily. You usually have
the option to not receive messages from people who are not in your social network
and hence making your social messages and alerts easier to take in. The only problem
I have found with networks such as Facebook is the excessive amounts of forwards and
invitations to join certain groups or install certain applications. Without thinking
about it I installed several <a href="http://www.facebook.com" target="_blank">Facebook</a> applications
just because friends forwarded them to me. I even ended up on a dating Facebook application,
which I had no intention of joining and had great difficulty removing myself from.
After awhile I started to find social networks just as tiring it was yet another "thing"
that needed attention and soon my Facebook account started to become just as tedious
to maintain. I found that the best way for people to get my attention or to get me
to respond to a social events was via MSN Messenger, phone or actually meeting me
and asking if I was attending something. Messenger is spontaneous and gets results.
Then someone introduced me to <a href="http://www.twitter.com/" target="_blank">Twitter</a> and
from there things started to change. 
</p>
        <p>
Twitter didn't demand the high maintenance of a social network and the noise created
by spam in an email account was easily avoidable. Twitter kept things simple, you
post a message in Twitter it can be anything you want and people can respond. If people
start spamming you, you remove them from the list of people you follow on Twitter.
Twitter is like a cross between blogging, MSN messenger and social interaction for
me. Its also a great platform to put a question to the world and get a response from
an expert in almost seconds. This got me thinking, if you keep things simple and they
don't demand a great amount of your time, people will stay with it. It was almost
as though traditional email should have had this built in. You can only send me emails
once I accept your email account is allowed to send me messages which has been attempted
before but requires you pay a subscription fee. I don't think social networks are
the new email 2.0 I just think they are yet another way of communicating with each
other. Each of these communication methods has its place. 
</p>
        <div class="wlWriterEditableSmartContent" id="scid:0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:204a96fb-f1f4-4239-9f8b-3c3b3079119e" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; float: none; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px">Technorati
Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/twitter" rel="tag">twitter</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/facebook" rel="tag">facebook</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/email+2.0" rel="tag">email
2.0</a></div>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://rory.streetfamily.info/aggbug.ashx?id=bad79769-1588-4c85-b584-6682b3440f52" />
      </body>
      <title>Social networks the new Email 2.0?</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rory.streetfamily.info/PermaLink,guid,bad79769-1588-4c85-b584-6682b3440f52.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://rory.streetfamily.info/PermaLink,guid,bad79769-1588-4c85-b584-6682b3440f52.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:20:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href="http://rory.streetfamily.info/content/binary/WindowsLiveWriter/SocialnetworksthenewEmail2.0_B446/FaceBook_2.jpg"&gt;&lt;img title="FaceBook" style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; display: inline; margin: 0px 10px 0px 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="168" alt="FaceBook" src="http://rory.streetfamily.info/content/binary/WindowsLiveWriter/SocialnetworksthenewEmail2.0_B446/FaceBook_thumb.jpg" width="396" align="left" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; My
friend &lt;a href="http://www.u-g-h.com/" target="_blank"&gt;Owen&lt;/a&gt; Twittered this &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7942304.stm" target="_blank"&gt;interesting
article&lt;/a&gt; on the BBC web site about how social networks are the "new e-mail". This
is a subject I have found pretty interesting, partly because every day of my life
since the Internet started to get popular I have been spammed excessively.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I have 3 personal email accounts which I am not very good at checking. The only email
account that gets my full attention is my work email account. My work emails get sorted
into what needs my immediate attention and items that are mildly interesting that
I will file away and most probably forget about. There may be a few social contacts
which I will probably set myself a reminder to deal with later in Outlook. To me email
has become a real chore for every email account you have you need to sort the noise
from your real contacts. It has become such an issue that sometimes I give up all
together on my personal email account and sit down maybe once a week separating adverts,
circulars and spam from genuine friends emailing me. In the old days email was not
like this, when you received an email it was an exciting occasion, someone genuinely
wanted to contact you. Email used to feel the same as &lt;a href="http://www.pc2paper.co.uk" target="_blank"&gt;receiving
a hand written letter in the post&lt;/a&gt; from a friend, but now I find 1 out of 10 emails
is usually spam. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Social networks help you separate spam from friend pretty easily. You usually have
the option to not receive messages from people who are not in your social network
and hence making your social messages and alerts easier to take in. The only problem
I have found with networks such as Facebook is the excessive amounts of forwards and
invitations to join certain groups or install certain applications. Without thinking
about it I installed several &lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com" target="_blank"&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt; applications
just because friends forwarded them to me. I even ended up on a dating Facebook application,
which I had no intention of joining and had great difficulty removing myself from.
After awhile I started to find social networks just as tiring it was yet another "thing"
that needed attention and soon my Facebook account started to become just as tedious
to maintain. I found that the best way for people to get my attention or to get me
to respond to a social events was via MSN Messenger, phone or actually meeting me
and asking if I was attending something. Messenger is spontaneous and gets results.
Then someone introduced me to &lt;a href="http://www.twitter.com/" target="_blank"&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt; and
from there things started to change. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Twitter didn't demand the high maintenance of a social network and the noise created
by spam in an email account was easily avoidable. Twitter kept things simple, you
post a message in Twitter it can be anything you want and people can respond. If people
start spamming you, you remove them from the list of people you follow on Twitter.
Twitter is like a cross between blogging, MSN messenger and social interaction for
me. Its also a great platform to put a question to the world and get a response from
an expert in almost seconds. This got me thinking, if you keep things simple and they
don't demand a great amount of your time, people will stay with it. It was almost
as though traditional email should have had this built in. You can only send me emails
once I accept your email account is allowed to send me messages which has been attempted
before but requires you pay a subscription fee. I don't think social networks are
the new email 2.0 I just think they are yet another way of communicating with each
other. Each of these communication methods has its place. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class="wlWriterEditableSmartContent" id="scid:0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:204a96fb-f1f4-4239-9f8b-3c3b3079119e" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; float: none; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px"&gt;Technorati
Tags: &lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tags/twitter" rel="tag"&gt;twitter&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tags/facebook" rel="tag"&gt;facebook&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tags/email+2.0" rel="tag"&gt;email
2.0&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://rory.streetfamily.info/aggbug.ashx?id=bad79769-1588-4c85-b584-6682b3440f52" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://rory.streetfamily.info/CommentView,guid,bad79769-1588-4c85-b584-6682b3440f52.aspx</comments>
      <category>facebook;letters</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://rory.streetfamily.info/Trackback.aspx?guid=3c4363f8-65fb-425c-a57a-129d50ce4c6e</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://rory.streetfamily.info/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://rory.streetfamily.info/PermaLink,guid,3c4363f8-65fb-425c-a57a-129d50ce4c6e.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Rory Street</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://rory.streetfamily.info/CommentView,guid,3c4363f8-65fb-425c-a57a-129d50ce4c6e.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://rory.streetfamily.info/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=3c4363f8-65fb-425c-a57a-129d50ce4c6e</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
I just have too much information to take in every day. At work I have about 50-100
e-mail's a day to cope with, then I have a constant feed of RSS traffic from just
too many blogs coming into my RSS reader, Facebook traffic comes in at a
constant stream and then my ISP email account and my GMail account never
end. 
</p>
        <p>
You would just say I could turn off the RSS reader? The problem is the current
project I am working on uses a Wiki for everything so every time people make
changes or tag things for your attention my RSS reader goes nuts bringing in traffic.
My work email account I have had for such a long time that I get all kinds of spam
now and company emails going back and forth. As it takes me so long to read everything
I just glance at it and use the Outlook flagging tool to mark it as important to read
later. I don't think I could cope with another social network or information source
and ironically enough when I want to get any work done at work I actually turn off
all of these information sources. Its funny that all these information sources that
are supposed to be such a "boost" and help in the workplace are actually a hindrance.
Every hour at work I will start up Outlook and begin deleting the messages that are
not important. Another interrupter at work is MSN messenger which we use for communicating
across sites, I will also turn this off when I need to get work done and turn it on
every now and again if I need to bother a colleague for help. 
</p>
        <p>
I realise a lot of organisations have blocked many of these "tools" and social networks on
their firewalls to stop their staff from being distracted, I like to think I am good
at self policing myself, but I realise why companies do this. Sometimes people just
can't help themselves and I have friends who admit they have a weakness not being
able to leave Facebook, Beebo or what ever social network they belong too alone while
at work. I personally never use social networks while at work, as I know how distracting
they are. Although one of things I say to people is while you are using them look
at the clock on your PC when you first start and write it down. Then look at
it again every now and again, you'll be quite amazed by how 2 minutes turns into 30minutes.
  
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://rory.streetfamily.info/aggbug.ashx?id=3c4363f8-65fb-425c-a57a-129d50ce4c6e" />
      </body>
      <title>Information Overload</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rory.streetfamily.info/PermaLink,guid,3c4363f8-65fb-425c-a57a-129d50ce4c6e.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://rory.streetfamily.info/PermaLink,guid,3c4363f8-65fb-425c-a57a-129d50ce4c6e.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 12:58:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
I just have too much information to take in every day. At work I have about 50-100
e-mail's a day to cope with, then I have a constant feed of RSS traffic from just
too many blogs coming into my RSS reader,&amp;nbsp;Facebook traffic comes in&amp;nbsp;at a
constant stream and&amp;nbsp;then my ISP email account and my&amp;nbsp;GMail account never
end. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
You would just say I could turn off the RSS reader? The problem is&amp;nbsp;the current
project I am working on uses a Wiki&amp;nbsp;for everything so every time people make
changes or tag things for your attention my RSS reader goes nuts bringing in traffic.
My work email account I have had for such a long time that I get all kinds of spam
now and company emails going back and forth. As&amp;nbsp;it takes me so long to read everything
I just glance at it and use the Outlook flagging tool to mark it as important to read
later. I don't think I could cope with another social network or information source
and ironically enough when I want to get any work done at work I actually turn off
all of these information sources. Its funny that all these information sources that
are supposed to be such a "boost" and help in the workplace are actually a hindrance.
Every hour at work I will start up Outlook and begin deleting the messages that are
not important. Another interrupter at work is MSN messenger which we use for communicating
across sites, I will also turn this off when I need to get work done and turn it on
every now and again if I need to bother a colleague for help. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I realise a lot of organisations have blocked many of these "tools" and social networks&amp;nbsp;on
their firewalls to stop their staff from being distracted, I like to think I am good
at self policing myself, but I realise why companies do this. Sometimes people just
can't help themselves and I have friends who admit they have a weakness not being
able to leave Facebook, Beebo or what ever social network they belong too alone while
at work. I personally never use social networks while at work, as I know how distracting
they are. Although one of things I say to people is while you are using them look
at the clock on&amp;nbsp;your PC when you first start and write it down. Then look at
it again every now and again, you'll be quite amazed by how 2 minutes turns into 30minutes.
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://rory.streetfamily.info/aggbug.ashx?id=3c4363f8-65fb-425c-a57a-129d50ce4c6e" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://rory.streetfamily.info/CommentView,guid,3c4363f8-65fb-425c-a57a-129d50ce4c6e.aspx</comments>
      <category>Blog Tools;facebook</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>